Rok wydania: 2020
Numer czasopisma: 4
Słowa kluczowe: podrabianie produktu, przekonania moralne, sygnały jakości
Strony: 22-28
Język publikacji: Angielski
Pobierz
Wpływ marki i zakotwiczenia cenowego oraz przekonań moralnych na postrzeganie cen produktów podrabianych
Tomasz Wanat
Abstrakt
Kupowanie podrobionych produktów stanowi poważne wyzwanie dla przemysłu, polityki gospodarczej i stanowienia prawa. Z tego powodu problematyka ta przyciąga uwagę wielu naukowców, badających jej przyczyny i konsekwencje. Głównym problemem badawczym artykułu było określenie, w jakim zakresie poziom ceny, który może wskazywać na podrobienie produktu, podlega moderującemu wypływowi efektu zakotwiczenia, poziomu znajomości marki oraz przekonań moralnych nabywcy. Przeprowadzony eksperyment wykazał, że poziom ceny sugerujący nabywcy podrobienie produktu nie jest stały. Zależy do znajomości marki oraz dostępności informacji o cenie produktu oryginalnego. W bardzo małym stopniu zależy od przekonań moralnych. Nawet kupujący posiadający silne przekonania moralne szacowali ceny sugerujące podrobienie produktu na relatywnie wysokim poziomie. Oznacza to, że byli podatni na podrabiane produkty nie mniej niż inni nabywcy.
Bibliografia
[1] Albers-Miller N.D. (1999), Consumer Misbehavior: Why People Buy Illicit Goods, „Journal of Consumer Marketing”, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 273–287. [2] Ariely D., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. (2003), „Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves without Stable Preferences, „The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, Vol. 118, No. 1, pp. 73–106. [3] Bian X., Wang K.Y., Smith A., Yannopoulou N. (2016), New Insights into Unethical Counterfeit Consumption, „Journal of Business Research”, Vol. 69, No. 10, pp. 4249–4258. [4] Casidy R., Lwin M., Phau I. (2017), Investigating the Role of Religiosity as a Deterrent Against Digital Piracy, „Marketing Intelligence & Planning”, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 62–80. [5] Chen J., Teng L., Liu S., Zhu H. (2015), Anticipating Regret and Consumers' Preferences for Counterfeit Luxury Products, „Journal of Business Research”, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 507–515. [6] Cheung W. L., Prendergast G. (2006), Buyers' Perceptions of Pirated Products in China, „Marketing Intelligence & Planning”, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 446–462. [7] Chi H.K., Yeh H.R., Yang Y.T. (2009), The Impact of Brand Awareness on Consumer Purchase Intention: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Quality and Brand Loyalty, „The journal of international management studies”, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 135–144. [8] Cordell V.V., Wongtada N., Kieschnick Jr R.L. (1996), Counterfeit Purchase Intentions: Role of Lawfulness Attitudes and Product Traits as Determinants, „Journal of Business Research”, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 41–53. [9] Dawar N., Parker P. (1994), Marketing Universals: Consumers' Use of Brand Name, Price, Physical Appearance, and Retailer Reputation as Signals of Product Quality, „The Journal of Marketing”, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 81–95. [10] Dodds W.B., Monroe K.B., Grewal D. (1991), Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations, „Journal of Marketing Research”, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 307–319. [11] Epley N., Gilovich T. (2006), The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic: Why the Adjustments are Insufficient, „Psychological science”, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 311–318. Fernandes C. (2013), Analysis of Counterfeit Fashion Purchase Behaviour in UAE, „Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal”, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 85-97. [12] Furnham A., Valgeirsson H. (2007), The Effect of Life Values and Materialism on Buying Counterfeit Products, „The Journal of Socio-Economics”, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 677–685. [13] Geiger-Oneto S., Gelb B.D., Walker D., Hess J.D. (2013), „Buying Status” by Choosing or Rejecting Luxury Brands and Their Counterfeits, „Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science”, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 357–372. [14] Gino F., Norton M.I., Ariely D. (2010), The Counterfeit Self: The Deceptive Costs of Faking It, „Psychological Science”, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 712–720. [15] Grewal D., Marmorstein H. (1994), Market Price Variation, Perceived Price Variation, and Consumers' Price Search Decisions for Durable Goods, „Journal of Consumer Research”, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 453–460. [16] Grossman G.M., Shapiro C. (1988), Foreign Counterfeiting of Status Goods, „The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 79–100. [17] Hayes A.F. (2018), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach, Guilford Publications. [18] Kim J.E., KP Johnson K.K. (2014), Shame or Pride? The Moderating Role of Self-construal on Moral Judgments Concerning Fashion Counterfeits, „European Journal of Marketing”, Vol. 48, No. 7/8, pp. 1431–1450. [19] Kim J.E., Cho H.J., Johnson K.K. (2009), Influence of Moral Affect, Judgment, and Intensity on Decision Making Concerning Counterfeit, Gray-market, and Imitation Products, „Clothing and Textiles Research Journal”, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 211–226. [20] Kirmani A., Rao A.R. (2000), No Pain, no Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality, „Journal of Marketing”, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 66–79. [21] Lee M., Johnson K.K. (2002), Exploring Differences between Internet Apparel Purchasers, Browsers and Non-purchasers, „Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal”, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 146–157. [22] Lichtenstein D.R., Ridgway N.M., Netemeyer R.G. (1993), Price Perceptions and Consumer Shopping Behavior: A Field Study, „Journal of Marketing Research”, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 234–245. [23] Milgrom P., Roberts J. (1986), Price and Advertising Signals of Product Quality, „Journal of Political Economy”, Vol. 94, No. 4, pp. 796–821. [24] Moores T.T., Chang J.C.J. (2006), Ethical Decision Making in Software Piracy: Initial Development and Test of a Four-component Model, „MIS Quarterly”, pp. 167–180. [25] OECD (2019), Trade in Fake Goods is Now 3.3% of World Trade and Rising https://www.oecd.org/newsroom/trade-in-fake-goods-is-now-33-of-world-trade-and-rising.htm, accessed: 09.10.2019 [26] Penz E., Stöttinger B. (2005), Forget the „Real” Thing – Take the Copy! An Explanatory Model for the Volitional Purchase of Counterfeit Products, „ACR North American Advances” Vol. 32, pp. 568–575. [27] Penz E., Stöttinger B. (2008), Original Brands and Counterfeit Brands—Do They Have Anything in Common? „Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review”, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 146–163. [28] Phau I., Teah M. (2009), Devil Wears (Counterfeit) Prada: A Study of Antecedents and Outcomes of Attitudes towards Counterfeits of Luxury Brands, „Journal of Consumer Marketing”, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 15–27. [29] Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F. (2004), SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models, „Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers”, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 717–731. [30] Quoquab F., Pahlevan S., Mohammad J., Thurasamy R. (2017), Factors Affecting Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Counterfeit Product: Empirical Study in the Malaysian Market, „Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics”, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 837–853. [31] Tan B. (2002), Understanding Consumer Ethical Decision Making with Respect to Purchase of Pirated Software, „Journal of consumer marketing”, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 96–111. [32] Tom G., Garibaldi B., Zeng Y., Pilcher J. (1998), Consumer Demand for Counterfeit Goods, „Psychology & Marketing”, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 405–421. [33] Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1974), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, „Science”, 185, No. 4157, pp. 1124–1131. [34] Wanat T. (2018), Price as a Signal of Product Counterfeiting. The Moderating Role of the Buyer’s Regulatory Focus, „Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia”, Vol. 6, No. 11, pp. 5–19. [35] Wilcox K., Kim H.M., Sen S. (2009), Why do Consumers Buy Counterfeit Luxury Brands? „Journal of marketing research”, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 247–259. [36] Zhou L., Yang Z., Hui M.K. (2010), Non-local or Local Brands? A Multi-level Investigation into Confidence in Brand Origin Identification and its Strategic Implications, „Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science”, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 202–218.
Publikacje z rocznika