Rok wydania: 2022
Numer czasopisma: 3
Słowa kluczowe: niestandardowe formy zatrudnienia, kohorty demograficzne, niedobrowolne formy zatrudnienia, interesy pracowników
Strony: 32-40
Język publikacji: Angielski
Formy zatrudnienia z perspektywy kohort demograficznych
Dominika Bąk-Grabowska, Anna Cierniak-Emerych, Szymon Dziuba, Katarzyna Grzesik
Abstrakt
Na podstawie przeglądu literatury przedmiotu dostrzeżono potrzebę analizy stosowania form zatrudnienia w różnych kohortach demograficznych. Istotna okazała się kategoria dobrowolności wyboru form zatrudnienia przez pracobiorców i respektowanie ich interesów w perspektywie długookresowej. Badania empiryczne przeprowadzono przy użyciu techniki CAWI na reprezentatywnej próbie 1000 pracujących Polaków. Wyniki badań wykazały zróżnicowanie w 4 badanych kohortach: 18–24, 25–39, 40–54, 55–64. W formach niestandardowych najczęściej pracują młodzi (niemal dwukrotnie częściej niż średnia w badanej populacji). W tej grupie wiekowej, w ramach zatrudnienia niestandardowego, dominują umowy prawa cywilnego i zatrudnienie nierejestrowane. W kolejnych dwóch grupach wiekowych znacząco rośnie udział stabilnych form zatrudnienia. Udział form niestandardowych wśród najstarszych jest wyraźnie wyższy niż w poprzednich dwóch kohortach. Statystycznie potwierdzono, że udział niedobrowolnych form zatrudnienia rośnie wraz z wiekiem. Współwystępuje to ze statystycznym potwierdzeniem prawidłowości, że im młodsi pracobiorcy, tym częstsza deklaracja, że formy niestandardowe pozwalają na zaspokojenie ich interesów. Zdecydowanie większa dysproporcja, przejawiająca się w mniejszym zaspokajaniu interesów pracobiorców niż pracodawców, występuje przy niestandardowych formach zatrudnienia. Ustalenia te podkreślają znaczenie formy zatrudnienia dla zaspokajania interesów pracobiorców i zależność tych kategorii od kohorty.
Bibliografia
References [1] Benach J., Amable M., Muntaner C., Benavides F.G. (2002), The Consequences of Flexible Work for Health: Are We Looking at the Right Place? „Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health”, Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 405–406. [2] Berkup S.B. (2014), Working with Generations X and Y in Generation Z Period: Management of Different Generations, [in:] Business Life, „Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences”, Vol. 5, No. 19, pp. 218–229. [3] Bernstrom V.H., Drange I., Mamelund, S.-E. (2019), Employability as an Alternative to Job Security, „Personnel Review”, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 234–248. [4] Bradley H., Van Hoof J. (2005), Young People in Europe. Labour Markets and Citizenship, Policy Press, Bristol. [5] Buchholz S., Rinklake A., Blossfeld H.-P. (2013), Reversing Early Retirement in Germany. A Longitudinal Analysis of the Effects of Recent Pension Reforms on the Timing of the Transition to Retirement and on Pension Incomes, „Comparative Population Studies”, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 881–906. [6] Cappelli P., Keller J.R. (2013), Classifying Work in the New Economy, ,,Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 575–596. [7] Chudzikowski K. (2012), Career Transitions and Career Success in the ‘New’ Career Era, „Journal of Vocational Behavior”, Vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 298–306. [8] Culpin B., Millar C., Peters K. (2015), Multi-generational Frames of Reference: Managerial Challenges of four Social Generations in the Orgnanisation, ,,Journal of Managerial Psychology”, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1–7. [9] D’Amours M. (2009), Non-standard Employment after Age 50: How Precarious is It? „Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations”, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 209–229. [10] Dries N., Pepermans R., de Kerpel E. (2008), Exploring four Generations’ Beliefs about Career – Is ‘Satisfied’ the New ‘Successful’, ,,Journal of Managerial Psychology”, Vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 907–928. [11] Egri C.P., Ralston D.A. (2004), Generation Cohorts and Personal Values: A Comparison of China and the US, „Organization Science”, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 210–220. [12] Eurostat (2020), Employees with a Contract of Limited Duration, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tps00073/default/table?lang=en, access date: 31.05.2021. [13] Farné S., Vergara C.A. (2015), Economic Growth, Labour Flexibilization and Employment Quality in Colombia, „International Labour Review”, Vol. 154, No. 2, pp. 253–269. [14] Foster K. (2013), Generation and Discourse in Working Life Stories, „The British Journal of Sociology”, Vol. 64, No. 22, pp. 195–215. [15] Gibson J.W., Greenwood R.A., Murphy Jr, E.F. (2009), Generational Differences in the Workplace: Personal Values, Behaviors, and Popular Beliefs, „Journal of Diversity Management”, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 1–8. [16] Gódány Z., Melinda Székely M. (2021), Atypical Forms of Employment in Slovakia Based on The Survey of Slovak Respondents of Generations X, Y and Z, https://relik.vse.cz/2020/ download/pdf/333-Godany-Zsuzsanna-paper.pdf, access date: 16.01.2021. [17] Green A., Livanos I. (2017), Involuntary Non-standard Employment in Europe, „European Urban and Regional Studies”, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 175–192. [18] Guerin-Marion C., Manion I., Parsons H. (2018), Leading an Intergenerational Workforce: An Integrative Conceptual Framework, „International Journal of Public Leadership”, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 48–58. [19] Hakansson K., Isidorsson T. (2016), Temporary Agency Workers-precarious Workers? Perceived Job Security and Employability for Temporary Agency Workers and Client Organization Employees at a Swedish Manufacturing Plant, „Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies”, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 3–22. [20] Holian R. (2015), Work, Career, Age and Life-stage: Assumptions and Preferences of a Multigenerational Workforce, „Labour & Industry A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work”, No. 25, pp. 278–292. [21] Kaźmierczyk J., Kaźmierczyk J., Chinalska A. (2018), Flexible Forms of Employment, an Opportunity or a Curse for the Modern Economy? Case Study: Banks in Poland, „Entrepreneurship and Sustainability”, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 782–798. [22] Kooij D.T.A.M., de Lange A.H., Jansen P.G.W., Kanfe, R., Dikkers J.S.E. (2011), Age and Work-related Motives: Results of a Meta-analysis, „Journal of Organizational Behavior”, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 197–225. [23] Lamb D., Banerjee R., Verma A. (2021), Immigrant–non-immigrant Wage Differentials in Canada: A Comparison between Standard and Nonstandard Jobs, „International Migration”, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 1–21. [24] Leighton P., Syrett M., Hecker R., Holland P. (2007), Out of the Shadows. Managing Self-employed, Agency and Outsourced Workers, Elsevier. [25] Lyons S.T., Schweitzer L., Ng, E.S. (2015), How Have Careers Changed? An Investigation of Changing Career Patterns across Four Generations, „Journal of Managerial Psychology”, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 8–21. [26] Lyons S. T., Schweitzer L., Ng E.S., Kuron L.K.J. (2012), Comparing Apples to Apples: A Qualitative Investigation of Career Mobility Patterns across Four Generations, „Career Development International”, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 333–357. [27] Lyons S., Kuron L. (2014), Generational Differences in the Workplace: A Review of the Evidence and Directions for Future Research, „Journal of Organizational Behavior”, No. 35, pp. 139–157. [28] Novikova O., Ostafiichuk Y., Khandii O. (2019) Social Justice and Economic Efficiency of the Modern Labour Market, „Baltic Journal of Economic Studies”, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 145–151. [29] Piwowar-Sulej K., Bąk-Grabowska D. (2021), The Impact of Mandate Contract and Self-employment on Workers’ Health–evidence from Poland, „International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health”, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 1–20. [30] Poor J., Vinogradov S., Tőzsér G.G., Antalik I., Horbulák Z., Juhász T., Kovács I.E., Némethy K. Machová R. (2017), Atypical Forms of Employment on Hungarian-Slovakian Border Areas in Light of Empirical Researches, „Acta Polytech. Hungarica”, Vol. 14, No. 7, pp. 123–141. [31] Richardson S., Lester L., Zhang G. (2012), Are Casual and Contract Terms of Employment Hazardous for Mental Health in Australia? „Journal of Industrial Relations”, No. 54, pp. 557–578. [32] Riekhoff A.-J., Ojala S., Pyöriä P. (2021), Career Stability in Turbulent Times: A Cross-cohort Study of Mid-careers in Finland, „Acta Sociologica”. [33] Singh A. (2014), Challenges and Issues of Generation Z. IOSR, „Journal of Business and Management”, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 59–63. [34] Smaliukiene R., Bekesiene S. (2020), Towards Sustainable Human Resources: How Generational Differences Impact Subjective Wellbeing in the Military? „Sustainability”, Vol. 12, No. 23.p. 10016. [35] Smola K.W., Sutton C.D. (2002), Generational Differences: Revisiting Generational Work Values for the New Millennium, „Journal of Organizational Behavior”, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 363–382. [36] Tophoven S., Tisch, A. (2016), Employment Trajectories of German Baby Boomers and their Effect on Statutory Pension Entitlements, „Advances in Life Course Research”, No. 30, pp. 90–110. [37] United Nations (2015), Population Division. World Population Ageing 2015, https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2015_Report.pdf, access date: 31.05.2021. [38] Vacchiano M., Marti J., Yepes-Cayuela L., Verd J.M. (2018), Personal Networks in Job Insertion among Young Adults in Times of Crisis: An Analysis in Barcelona, „Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas”, No. 161, pp. 121–140. [39] Wang X., Han L., Huang J., Zhang L., Rozelle S. (2016), Gender and Off-farm Employment: Evidence from Rural China, „China & World Economy”, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 18–36. [40] Zaleska K.J., de Menezes L.M. (2007), Human Resources Development Practices and their Association with Employee Attitudes: Between Traditional and New Careers, „Human Relations”, Vol. 60, No. 7, pp. 987–1018.
Publikacje z rocznika